law
origin of law
Blackstone placed the Creator at the beginning of his account of law, before municipal law;
Blackstone began with Creation; in his account, the Supreme Being formed the universe and impressed principles upon created matter; man, although endowed with reason and free will, remained entirely dependent upon his Creator;
“Man, considered as a creature, must necessarily be subject to the laws of his Creator, for he is entirely a dependent being.”
“And consequently, as man depends absolutely upon his Maker for every thing, it is necessary that he should, in all points, conform to his Maker’s will. This will of his Maker is called the law of nature.”
natural and divine law
natural law: Blackstone wrote that reason enabled man to discover the purport of those laws; he recorded three general precepts: “that we should live honestly, should hurt nobody, and should render to every one his due”;
divine law: Blackstone called what is expressly revealed in holy scripture “the revealed or divine law”; he wrote that no human laws should be suffered to contradict either foundation;
human law: if any human law should allow or enjoin us to commit it, we are bound to transgress that human law, or else we must offend both the natural and the divine;
William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, George Sharswood ed., vol. I (1893), Introduction, §II, star pages *38–*43; Sharswood pagination 24–29; "In foro conscientiae” is a Latin phrase that translates to “in the forum of conscience.” It refers to matters that are dealt with in one’s inner sense of moral judgment rather than in external legal or judicial forums“To instance in the case of murder: this is expressly forbidden by the divine, and demonstrably by the natural law; and, from these prohibitions, arises the true unlawfulness of this crime. Those human laws that annex a punishment to it do not at all increase its moral guilt, or superadd any fresh obligation, in foro conscientiæ, to abstain from its perpetration. Nay, if any human law should allow or enjoin us to commit it, we are bound to transgress that human law, or else we must offend both the natural and the divine.”
dominion
In the beginning of the world, we are informed by holy writ, the all-bountiful Creator gave to man “dominion over all the earth, and over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.”(a) This is the only true and solid foundation of man’s dominion over external things, whatever airy metaphysical notions may have been started by fanciful writers upon this subject.
note (a): Genesis 1:28;
immediate context: Blackstone continued that the earth and all things therein were “the general property of all mankind … from the immediate gift of the Creator” and wrote that, while the earth continued bare of inhabitants, “it is reasonable to suppose that all was in common among them”; he then described temporary possession through use before more permanent dominion developed;
i say, a man can not own anything in that which he is part, and can not choose to partake;
when a man seizes to his use that which once lay in common, dominion, once established, remains with him until, by some other deed, he shows his intention to abandon it;
i have dominion where i have possession, use, enjoyment, disposal, and exclusion in respect of a thing, all without control, diminution, or interference by another man; dominion arises by way of occupancy in the absence of another man's dominion, and ceases upon abandonment; it is free of wrong doing in its origin;
to interfere with dominion without agreement is a wrong; the wrong is found in the deed, and remedy becomes due to cease the interference, restore dominion, or make good the result; no man can derive a claim from his own wrong doing;
art
Crown is an abstract concept described by man kind as a Corporation sole and the absolute owner of land in England and Wales; it does not exist; it is made up; it is an invention; it is non sense;
Acts are written by man kind, and copyright passed to fiction; it is obvious that a fiction can not own or license copyright, nor give authority, yet man kind of the legal society rely upon that false premise; see fraud;
i see the equality of man kind and claim no authority over another man and authority can not be derived from an imaginary device;
conclusion: Blackstone's account of artificial persons does not answer the offence stated here against natural and divine law (Lev 19:11, Exo 20:1-4); legal persons are deemed to be an entity or body having an existence separate and distinct from the persons that comprise them; how is that even possible, see fraud;
i ask, does thou pretend to represent a fiction of law, and coerce man kind to act accordingly, or wish to force thy deceit and licenses upon others?
name
i did abandon title, and surname (Crown/implied), which is on record at the High Court of England and Wales (A.D. 2024), and notice.wales (A.D. 2025), not withstanding that England is a concept, not a mass of earth;
i have a new name, but i am not it, and i can not identify with fiction, example: a British Citizen, or UK Resident, it is not possible; man can only appear as or in person, not be it; see /gdpr
in proper use, a name is what a thing is; i am, or awareness, is the name of man, and im-manu-el the man within;
rights
rights are an illusion; law becomes visible when man kind interact; that interaction is either agreement, or a deed done, or a due deed not done; where the deed ought not be done, or the deed due is not done, herein is wrong;
framework
this is the PB working framework and use of the words; it is not an exact quotation from the OED or another source;
man
man is one of man kind, not an office, mask, capacity, corporation, legal character, fiction, or thing; a man does the deed, answers, claims, or is wronged; man kind is the kind, race, or species of man, especially where man kind is treated as saleable, billable, tradeable, or an instrument of gain;
deed and deed due
a deed is the thing done by a man; in this framework it is communication or physical doing; a deed due is the thing owing to be done by agreement or remedy; first state the deed, then ask whether the deed ought not be done, or whether the deed due was not done;
wrong
wrong is either a deed done that ought not be done, or a deed due that is not done; the wrong is found in the deed itself, or in the non-doing of the deed due; after the wrong, state one result: hurt, damage, loss, or nothing; the result is not the wrong itself;
kinds of wrong
- communication
- by pressure: menace, duress, compulsion, and extortion;
- by falsehood: a man presents what is false; did he know it was false?
- by deceit: a man knowingly uses falsehood, false appearance, or a concealed fact to mislead another man;
- by fraud: a man uses deceit to seek an unjust advantage, get something not due, or bring about hurt, damage, or loss for another man; the actual result is hurt, damage, loss, or nothing;
- related deeds: vexation and barratry are not automatically deceit;
- physical doing
- against man: interference with movement, hindrance or let, detainment, force, assault, battery, wounding, maim, restraint, durance, and imprisonment; detainment is where one man stops or restricts the movement of another man; restraint is where one man physically prevents another man from moving freely by holding his body or fastening a physical tool to it; name manacles or another physical thing as the tool used, not as another wrong;
- against dominion: interference with dominion, hindrance or let to use or enjoyment, force against a thing, breach of close, taking, use without agreement, and meddling with another man's thing;
- making merchandise of man kind
- making merchandise, traffic, selling, setting to price, commodity, profit, and gain, where man kind, body, custody, attendance, process, surrender, name, or account is used as trade or advantage;
- deed due not done
- withholding deed due, debt after bill and notice, the deed due by way of remedy held back, answer withheld, release withheld, correction withheld, and settlement withheld;
result and remedy
after the wrong, state one result: hurt, damage, loss, or nothing; hurt is adverse change to the body of a man; damage is adverse change to a thing; loss is deprivation of something previously possessed, enjoyed, exercised, available, or expected by agreement; nothing is no hurt, damage, or loss; remedy due is the deed now owing because of the wrong: cease, correct, release, answer, withdraw, give the deed due, or make good hurt, damage, or loss; where the result is nothing, remedy may still be due to cease, correct, release, answer, withdraw, or give the deed due;
